Home » Telecoms » Landlord Redevelopment

If you need telecoms equipment removal to enable redevelopment, you are dealing with real legal protection, not just a request to leave. The Communications Act 2003 and often the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 both apply, so agreeing terms takes genuine skill. We review your tenancy agreement, consider the relevant legislation, and look at your wider plans for the property, including any adjoining land you control.

Several routes can achieve vacant possession. We advise on lift and shift clauses, explore tenancy surrender and renewal, or negotiate termination and removal directly. Where court involvement is unavoidable, we work with your solicitors to agree Court Consent Orders, giving you certainty over timing before redevelopment begins.

Few neighbouring sites usually offer a genuine alternative location, which can make regaining possession harder than it first appears. Our telecoms team’s industry knowledge and connections often secure a negotiated settlement rather than a contested one, and in our experience that route tends to produce a more certain, more positive outcome than litigation alone.

KEY CONTACTS

Tom Bodley Scott

Tom Bodley Scott
MRICS FAAV
Tunbridge Wells

Aerial view of a housing estate bordering open farmland

A carbon audit tells you where your farm stands, but turning that into income or savings usually means looking at it alongside the wider mix of grants and environmental schemes available to your land.

Yes, but not immediately. Operators hold real legal protection under the Communications Act and often the Landlord and Tenant Act, so removal usually needs to go through an agreed route, such as a lift and shift clause, tenancy surrender, or a negotiated termination, rather than a simple request to leave.

There’s no fixed timescale, it depends on the agreement in place and which route is used to end it. Where court involvement is unavoidable, a Court Consent Order can give you certainty over timing, so redevelopment can proceed on a known date rather than an open-ended one.

It’s a provision that allows an operator’s equipment to be relocated elsewhere on your land or nearby, rather than removed entirely, often used when a small change accommodates redevelopment without ending the agreement altogether.

This is common, and it is often what makes regaining possession harder than expected. Where relocation is not realistic, we negotiate termination and removal directly, drawing on our knowledge of the operators and the market to reach a workable settlement.

In our experience, a negotiated settlement usually produces a more certain and more positive outcome than litigation, though court involvement is sometimes unavoidable. We work with your solicitors either way, so you’re not choosing between the two without support.

Offices in Battle, Haywards Heath, Pulborough, Surrey Hills and Tunbridge Wells.

Andrew Mallard

Director

Tunbridge Wells

Andrew Schonfeld, Telecoms, Tunbridge Wells

Access Scheduling Coordinator

Tunbridge Wells

Cameron Lindsay, Telecoms, Tunbridge Wells

Graduate Surveyor

Tunbridge Wells

Candice Eman Telecoms

Access Scheduling Coordinator

Tunbridge Wells

Hayley Olley

Director

Tunbridge Wells

Jason Denning, Telecoms, Tunbridge Wells

Associate

Tunbridge Wells

King Opara

Graduate Surveyor

Tunbridge Wells

Max Ringer, Senior Surveyor, Tunbridge Wells

Senior Surveyor

Tunbridge Wells

Nicola Corcoran

Senior Administrator

Tunbridge Wells

Paula Scotton

Access Administrator

Tunbridge Wells

Robert Hepworth

Senior Director

Tunbridge Wells

Robin Whatley

Senior Director

Tunbridge Wells

Saskia Amor

Access Manager

Tunbridge Wells

Simon Harrington

Associate

Tunbridge Wells

Thomas Cornelisse

Graduate Surveyor

Tunbridge Wells

Tom Bodley Scott

Company Director

Tunbridge Wells

William Crotty, Graduate Surveyor, Tunbridge Wells

Graduate Surveyor

Tunbridge Wells